Archive: 5th March 2026

Loans to Participators

There are special rules to prevent close companies, generally companies controlled by a small group of individuals, from allowing directors or shareholders to take money out of the company without paying the appropriate tax. Under CTA10/S455, if a close company makes a loan to participators (typically a shareholder, director or someone with significant influence) it can be liable to pay tax on that transaction.

The S455 charge does not automatically make the loan a distribution or income for the recipient, but the company must account for the tax. Some limited exceptions exist, such as loans made in the ordinary course of a lending business.

If a loan remains outstanding beyond nine months and one day after the end of the company’s accounting period, the company must pay a tax charge, calculated as a percentage of the loan amount. This ensures that short-term loans that are quickly repaid do not trigger the charge. The tax is calculated on each new loan or benefit in an accounting period, not the total outstanding balance.

Loans to directors or employees on beneficial terms may also create additional tax liabilities under employment income rules. Companies must include any S455 liability in their Corporation Tax return.

Source:HM Revenue & Customs | 02-03-2026

What Is a person with significant control?

A person with significant control (PSC) is someone who owns or exercises significant influence over a company. They can also be referred to as a “beneficial owner”.

Every UK company is required to identify its PSCs and register their details with Companies House. A company can have one or more PSCs.

A PSC is someone who meets one or more of the “nature of control” conditions.

A PSC is usually anyone who:

  • has more than 25% shares or voting rights in your company
  • can appoint or remove a majority of directors
  • can influence or control your company or trust

Companies should review their register of members as well as their constitution and articles of association to help determine who meets these criteria.

When incorporating a company, and whenever PSC details change, the required information must be filed with Companies House within 14 days of confirmation. Required details include the PSC’s name, date of birth, nationality, correspondence or service address, level of shareholding and the date they became a PSC.

PSCs must also verify their identity and provide a personal code. Failing to provide accurate information, or refusing to respond to formal notices, is a criminal offence.

Source:Companies House | 02-03-2026

Meaning of “bona vacantia”

Bona vacantia is Latin term meaning “ownerless goods”. The bodies that deal with bona vacantia claims vary across the United Kingdom, but they all ultimately represent the Crown.

Under company law, when a company is dissolved, any remaining rights or property automatically pass to the Crown as bona vacantia. This includes valid rights such as a tax refund from HMRC. However, if the company never had a genuine legal entitlement, for example, because a claim was fraudulent, then no right existed in the first place and nothing passes as bona vacantia.

It is important to note that only formally dissolved companies are affected by bona vacantia. A company that is “in liquidation” or “being wound up” is in the process of closure but still legally exists. Until dissolution takes place, the company’s property and rights remain vested in the company.

In some circumstances, a company may apply to be restored to the register if it was dissolved less than six years ago. If restoration is successful, any property previously treated as bona vacantia revests in the company as though it had never been dissolved. However, restoration can be a very complex and costly process. For that reason, directors should ensure that all assets, including potential tax refunds, are properly addressed before a company is dissolved.

Source:HM Government | 02-03-2026

Reclaiming VAT on a self-build home project

Reclaiming VAT on a self-build home project can significantly reduce the overall cost of building or converting your property. The VAT DIY Housebuilders Scheme is a special VAT scheme that allows private individuals to benefit from the same VAT advantages as professional property developers. Under this scheme, the qualifying construction costs of a new home and certain types of conversion work can effectively benefit from VAT zero-rating. This allows qualifying homeowners to reclaim the VAT paid on eligible building materials.

A claim can be made for qualifying building materials on which VAT has been charged. Qualifying materials include most materials incorporated into a new building or conversion which cannot easily be removed. This includes items such as bricks, timber, roofing materials, plumbing, wiring and plaster. Items such as fitted furniture, carpets, curtains, and certain domestic appliances are excluded from the scheme, even if they are installed as part of the build.

In most cases, you must submit a claim within six months of completing the new build or conversion project. Completion is usually evidenced by a completion certificate or similar official documentation.

Claims are normally submitted online. However, if you are unable to use the digital service, you can apply using paper forms. There are two main forms available: VAT 431NB for new build properties, and VAT 431C for qualifying conversions.

Source:HM Revenue & Customs | 02-03-2026

Claiming a tax refund from HMRC

If you have paid too much tax to HMRC, you may be able to claim a tax refund. Overpayments can happen for several reasons, such as a change in employment, being placed on the wrong tax code or failing to claim certain allowances or expenses.

The way you claim depends on your circumstances such as whether or not you complete a self-assessment tax return and how long ago the overpayment occurred.

HMRC states that you may be eligible for a refund if you have overpaid tax on:

  • Income from employment
  • Job-related expenses (for example, working from home, fuel, uniforms or tools)
  • A pension
  • A self-assessment tax return
  • A redundancy payment
  • UK income while living abroad
  • Interest from savings or Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) payouts
  • Income from a life or pension annuity
  • Foreign income
  • UK income earned before leaving the UK

HMRC offers an online service at www.gov.uk/claim-tax-refund/y that allows you to check whether you are eligible and, in many cases, submit a claim.

In most situations, you can backdate a claim up to four years from the end of the relevant tax year. This means you can still claim a refund for the 2021–22 tax year (which ended on 5 April 2022) until 5 April 2026.

Source:HM Revenue & Customs | 02-03-2026

Changes to reporting of BiKs

Mandatory payrolling of benefits in kind (BiKs) and taxable employment expenses will be introduced from 6 April 2027. This represents a major change in reporting and means that for most benefits, the annual P11D form will no longer be required from the start of the 2027-28 tax year.

The requirement to report Income Tax and Class 1A National Insurance on most BiKs through Real Time Information (RTI) was originally due to start on 6 April 2026 but has been delayed until 6 April 2027 to allow additional time for employers, payroll professionals, software providers and agents to prepare.

The deadline to register for the current voluntary payrolling service for the 2026-27 tax year is 5 April 2026. After this, the service will close in preparation for the introduction of mandatory payrolling. 

From April 2027, employers will report BiKs and expenses via the Full Payment Submission (FPS), aligning reporting with the process currently used for reporting salaries. The number of RTI fields will be expanded to reflect the data currently captured through P11D and P11D(b) forms. Employers will also have the option to payroll employment-related loans and accommodation on a voluntary basis.

To support implementation, HMRC will waive penalties for inaccuracies related to mandatory payrolling for 2027–28, provided there is no evidence of deliberate non-compliance. However, existing late filing, late payment penalties and interest will continue to apply.

HMRC has confirmed that its Basic PAYE Tools software will also be updated to support payrolling of benefits in kind from April 2027.

Source:HM Revenue & Customs | 02-03-2026

Spring Statement 2026

The Chancellor’s Spring Statement, presented to Parliament 3 March 2026, was packed with political content that has no real impact for UK taxpayers, business owners or employees. The substance of her presentation was a summary of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) Economic and fiscal outlook released on the same date.

Our summary that follows highlights the main points of the OBR statement and adds our reflections on the possible effects these plans will have on future UK taxation policy.
It is also worth mentioning that if the present unrest in the Middle East continues, these forecasts may become untenable.  

What the OBR outlook means for you and future taxation

Following the Chancellor’s Spring Statement, the OBR has published its Economic and fiscal outlook: March 2026. While the document is technical, it provides an important signal about the direction of the UK economy and, crucially, the future shape of the tax system.

This briefing summarises the key items and explains what they may mean for individuals, business owners and investors over the next few years.

The wider economic picture

The OBR expects the UK economy to grow slowly in the near term, before improving modestly later in the decade. Economic growth is forecast to be around 1.1 per cent in 2026, rising to an average of around 1.6 per cent a year thereafter. This is weaker than historic norms and reflects long-standing issues such as low productivity, growth and an ageing workforce.

Inflation is expected to continue falling and move closer to the Bank of England’s 2 per cent target by late 2026. This should help ease pressure on household finances, but it also reduces the pace at which tax revenues naturally increase through wage and price growth.

The overall message is that the economy is stable, but not strong. That matters because government tax receipts depend heavily on economic growth.

The state of the public finances

Government borrowing is forecast to fall gradually over the coming years. Public sector borrowing is expected to decline from just over 5 per cent of GDP in 2024–25 to around 1.6 per cent of GDP by 2030–31. This improvement is largely driven by a high tax take and steady economic growth, rather than major reductions in public spending.

Public sector net debt remains high, stabilising at around 95 per cent of GDP. This is historically elevated and leaves the public finances sensitive to shocks such as higher interest rates or weaker growth.

For taxpayers, this matters because high debt limits the government’s room to cut taxes. Even modest economic setbacks could quickly put pressure back on borrowing.

What this means for future taxation

The OBR does not set tax policy, but its forecasts strongly influence government decisions. The outlook points to several important themes for future taxation.

First, the overall tax burden is expected to remain high. Tax receipts as a share of the economy are close to post-war highs and are forecast to stay there. This suggests that meaningful, broad-based tax cuts are unlikely in the near term.

Secondly, much of the recent increase in tax revenue has come from so-called fiscal drag. Income Tax thresholds have been frozen, meaning that as wages rise, more income is taxed at higher rates. Although inflation is easing, this effect will continue as long as thresholds remain unchanged.

For individuals, this means that effective tax rates may continue to rise even if headline rates do not change. More people are likely to be drawn into higher and additional rate bands over time.

Income Tax and National Insurance

The outlook reinforces the likelihood that Income Tax and National Insurance will remain the government’s most reliable sources of revenue. These taxes are broad-based, predictable and relatively difficult to avoid.

While large increases in headline rates appear unlikely, continued freezes to allowances and thresholds remain a realistic option. Over time, this increases the tax burden on earned income without the need for explicit tax rises.

For employees and directors, this underlines the importance of reviewing remuneration structures, including the balance between salary, dividends and pension contributions, to ensure tax efficiency within the rules.

Business taxation

Corporation Tax receipts remain strong following the increase in the main rate in recent years. The OBR forecasts suggest that business taxes will continue to play a significant role in supporting the public finances.

Given the constraints on public spending and the need for stable revenues, there may be limited appetite for significant reductions in business taxes. Instead, future changes are more likely to focus on reliefs, allowances and compliance measures.

Businesses should expect continued scrutiny of reliefs and incentives, alongside a focus on timely reporting and accurate tax compliance.

Capital taxes and wealth

Although the OBR does not focus heavily on capital taxes in this outlook, the broader fiscal context is important. High public debt and long-term spending pressures increase the likelihood of further reform to taxes on capital and wealth.

Capital Gains Tax, Inheritance Tax and property-related taxes are all areas where governments may seek additional revenue without raising Income Tax rates. This may take the form of rate changes, allowance reductions, or restrictions on reliefs rather than entirely new taxes.

For individuals with significant assets, this reinforces the importance of forward planning, particularly around asset disposals, succession and estate planning.

Long-term pressures and ageing

The OBR highlights the growing cost of an ageing population, particularly in relation to health, social care and pensions. These pressures increase over time and extend beyond the current forecast period.

Unless public spending is reduced or restructured, higher revenues will be required in the long term. This suggests that future tax policy will increasingly focus on sustainability rather than short-term incentives.

From a planning perspective, this points towards a tax environment where reliefs and allowances may become more restricted, and where long-term strategies are preferable to reactive decisions.

Uncertainty and risk

The OBR places significant emphasis on uncertainty. Geopolitical risks, energy prices, productivity trends and labour market changes could all materially affect the outlook.

If the economy underperforms, the government may need to respond quickly. Historically, this has often involved tax measures introduced at relatively short notice. This reinforces the value of regular reviews and keeping tax planning flexible.

What clients should take away

The key message from the OBR outlook is not that major tax rises are imminent, but that the scope for tax cuts is limited. The UK is likely to remain a relatively high-tax economy for the foreseeable future.

Incremental changes, rather than dramatic reforms, are the most likely path. Threshold freezes, relief adjustments and targeted measures are expected to remain central tools of tax policy.

For individuals and businesses, this makes proactive planning essential. Understanding how existing rules apply, making use of available reliefs, and reviewing structures regularly can make a meaningful difference over time.

If you would like to discuss how these trends may affect your personal or business circumstances, we would be happy to help you review your position and plan ahead.

Source:HM Government | 02-03-2026

Why disregarding the minimum wage constitutes modern slavery

The National Minimum Wage (NMW) Act 1998 remains contentious, especially after the introduction of the NMW (Amendment) Regulations 2025, as it draws the legal line in the sand between employment and slavery, as highlighted by a recent case.  

The claimant was born in the Philippines in 1990 and travelled to the UAE in the employ of a diplomat and his family, after which she was relocated to London. Her three months of employment in the UK involved extreme exploitation, verbal abuse, threats and isolation, as she was effectively forced to work eighteen-hour days, with no breaks or rest days. Her movements were strictly controlled, as the family retained custody of her passport and frequently locked her inside the flat when they were away. She was further isolated by being denied access to a SIM card or the household Wi-Fi, while her compensation was almost non-existent, falling far below the statutory NMW.

It was concluded that, as she had been a victim of human trafficking and suffered from PTSD, she was granted leave to remain in the UK in 2015. The High Court awarded over £146,000 in ‘punitive’ damages in a “default” assessment, including £85,000 for false imprisonment and injury to feelings, £35,000 for psychiatric injury, and £15,000 in exemplary damages. Given the resurgence of modern slavery and human trafficking cases, this ruling renders “sub-clinical distress” a litigable tort in forced labour cases, potentially reaching the highest band of compensation.  

While the NMW Act allows for a “current rate” uplift in a standard Employment Tribunal, the Judge ruled that this does not automatically apply to a claim brought in tort. If a claimant sues for “servitude” or “negligence” rather than a straight breach of contract, they may only be entitled to the wage rates that existed at the time the work was done. This presents a claimant with a strategic choice between pursuing a statutory (i.e., for higher money) or a tort claim (for general damages, including PTSD).

Cases of severe harassment and abuse can result in a “loss of earnings” that can extend far beyond the period of employment, due to traumatic psychological damage or unwarranted references. Thus, HR departments should actively monitor ongoing workplace conflicts to safeguard against claims under the new Employment Rights Act and NMW (Amendment) Regulations. 

Source:High Court | 02-03-2026

Renewed conflict in the Middle East

Renewed conflict in the Middle East is already having knock on effects for the global economy, and UK business owners are likely to feel the impact through higher costs and increased uncertainty rather than direct disruption.

The most immediate pressure point is energy. The Middle East remains a critical region for global oil and gas supply, and any escalation tends to push wholesale prices higher. Even short term market reactions usually feed through to UK petrol and diesel prices, and to business energy bills over time. For firms with transport heavy operations or energy intensive processes, this can quickly squeeze margins.

Higher energy costs also ripple through supply chains. Increased fuel prices raise the cost of moving goods, both domestically and internationally. Where shipping routes are disrupted or rerouted, freight costs rise further and delivery times lengthen. For import reliant businesses, particularly retailers and manufacturers, this can affect both pricing and stock availability.

These pressures feed into the wider cost of living picture. As households face higher fuel and utility costs, discretionary spending often weakens. Hospitality, leisure and non-essential retail tend to feel this first, as consumers become more cautious. Even businesses that are not directly exposed to energy markets can be affected through softer demand.

There is also a broader inflationary risk. If higher energy and transport costs persist, overall inflation may remain elevated for longer. This increases the chance that interest rates stay higher than previously expected, affecting borrowing costs, investment decisions and property markets.

For UK business owners, the key response is planning rather than panic. Reviewing energy usage, stress testing cash flow, and building flexibility into pricing and supplier arrangements can help manage a period of heightened volatility.

Source:Other | 01-03-2026

AI and the future of work: why healthcare remains resilient

As artificial intelligence becomes embedded in everyday business activity, many clients are asking how it might affect their industry and long term prospects. While some sectors face significant disruption, healthcare and social care stand out as the most resilient major industry as AI develops.

The core reason is demand. Healthcare is driven by long term demographic trends rather than technology cycles. An ageing population, rising life expectancy and an increase in long term and chronic conditions mean that demand for medical and care services continues to grow steadily. This underlying pressure alone limits the scope for workforce reduction, even where productivity improves.

AI is already playing an important role in healthcare. Diagnostic support tools, medical imaging analysis, appointment scheduling, triage systems and clinical note drafting are becoming increasingly common. However, these technologies tend to support professionals rather than replace them. Clinical decisions still require judgement, context and accountability, all of which remain firmly human responsibilities.

Much of the value delivered in healthcare and social care is also relational. Patients need explanations they can understand, reassurance at stressful moments and ongoing support rather than one off interventions. In social care in particular, the service is inseparable from human presence. While technology can assist with monitoring and coordination, it cannot replicate empathy, trust or personal interaction.

In short, while AI will reshape how healthcare operates, it is far more likely to change how people work than to remove the need for them.

Source:Other | 01-03-2026